Childfree Reflections

With Marcia Drut-Davis

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

January 9th, 2012 by Marcia Davis

Beyonce’s New Baby!

Blue Ivy is here. That’s the new child’s name of rapper JZ and Beyonce. Although Hollywood still makes every new baby of any movie or rock star more important than the second coming of Christ, here are some important facts as told to the press: Lenox Hill Hospital had to redecorate her wing and install bullet-proof glass to the tune of 1.3 million big ones. Anyone attending the neonatal unit had to leave for at least 20 minutes to allow JZ and Beyonce complete privacy. This meant parents of severly challenged infants who may have lost the last precious minutes of their child’ s life! The personal home of this couple added a complete nursey with, I’m guessing, around the clock staff for mother, father and child.

Ah yes! Just like other couples or single women choosing to have a child. Look at how people will swoon over Blue Ivy? How many more people will be lured by all the fuss and excitement to claim their own bundle of joy? Sadly, how many won’t have the resources or abilities to parent well? Pronatalism lives on!

November 13th, 2011 by Marcia Davis

Is not choosing to have or raise children seen as a viable choice today?

I often hear people telling me that today it’s not a big deal to choose a childfree lifestyle. I’ve heard it’s an accepted choice amongst most families once anyone states they don’t want children. Nobody gets pushed into feeling they’re making a bad choice they will regret later. Really?  I wonder if that’s true!

Yes. More people are opting to remain childfree than in my day back in the 70’s. However, things have dramatically chånged. Although women may delay childbearing, they now feel they can raise children alone. There’s no need for any man. Indeed, all they require is his sperm which they can get from a sperm donor bank. Single parenting is also glorified by movie stars such as Sandra Bullock who adopted a child from another race. (Do not misunderstand me. I’m happy any child gets placed into a loving, capable persons care!)

I don’t think anyone would lose their job as a teacher if they were interviewed on “60 Minutes” sharing they don’t choose to parent today…. as I suffered back in 1974. I certainly hope they wouldn’t!   However, pronatalism still exists. Every time I’ve gone to any bridal shower, that baby gift is always there whether or not they know if raising children has been accepted. Every time I’ve been to a wedding, questions start about family planning from excited friends and would-be grandparents.

What do you think? Today, is the childfree lifestyle accepted with the same respect, excitement and encouragement as having children? I would love hearing from you!

October 24th, 2011 by Marcia Davis

Re: Hearing, “We are pregnant”.

I’ve always wondered why people say, “We are pregnant”. It’s the woman who is pregnant, isn’t it? Even when it’s a lesbian couple, one has the fetus growing inside her, not the other. I’ve always snickered at the thought but let it go. If  any couple find that one of them is pregnant, the other also shares so much during that time: dealing with issues of weight gain, morning sickness, hemorrhoids, mood swings from hormonal changes, varicose veins and other common pregnancy experiences can be a daunting task for both people. But, this week, I got it! My husband was diagnosed with early staged prostate cancer. I now hear myself saying, “We have cancer”.  As in pregnancy, when one person faces any health challenges, the other is involved. Unlike pregnancy, people respond happily when they hear, “We are pregnant” but I find people looking at me as if I have three heads when I say, “We have cancer”. I wonder why?

August 7th, 2011 by Marcia Davis

The New Breast Feeding Baby Doll

You just read that title right. This AM on “The Today Show”, there was an animated discussion about whether or not this new toy was a blessing or a mistake. A poll revealed that 76% were against this doll. However, the displeasure appeared to be the age old argument about breast feeding as a natural part of life!

I was shocked that not one word was mentioned about how pronatalistic it is to insist on giving a little girl a doll in the first place. Now, they have a doll that when placed over a fitted bib, can imitate  a sucking movement with a gurgling sound at a little girls breast! Doesn’t anyone see how dangerous this is? It’s not about breast feeding vs bottle feeding. In my opinion, it’s telling  little girls mothering is in their future. It should be that a doll is just a toy and that mothering is a choice they can make when they are older!

I was thrilled when parents started giving boys dolls. How could they use this one?

August 2nd, 2011 by Marcia Davis

Is having and raising pets equal to having children?

http://mediatracks.com/Segments/Pets_as_kids.mp3.
Listen to this sound bite from a recent interview with Laura Scott about this subject. What’s your opinion?

July 31st, 2011 by Marcia Davis

August 1, Non-Parents Day

  1. Over 30 years ago, the National Organization for Non-Parents (which became National Alliance for Optional Parenthood, or NAOP) ), deemed August 1 Non-Parents Day. Please read the first blog post on my friend’s Laura Carroll’s blog. Then, send letters to “60 Minutes” asking for a re-visit to the 1974 story. Mike Wallace ended that story with,”Pardon our perverseness for showing this on Mother’s Day.”

    laviechildfree.com

July 5th, 2011 by Marcia Davis

Casey Anthony Trial: Is there justice for Caylee?

The Casey Anthony trial in America is now over. Casey was accused of murdering her child Caylee. The jury’s verdict was “not guilty!” Obviously, the jury felt there was reasonable doubt of her guilt because the State failed to prove it was her fault. But, society is screaming the words, “she’s guilty!”

During the 31 days when Casey’s daughter was missing, people saw photos of her in clubs, dancing and seeming to be having fun. She never called 911. She never told her parents her child was missing. She finally lied saying it was a nanny who stole her.

How could any sane mother do that? It’s against the myth of mom and apple pie.

Does anyone see something here not already shared? In my opinion, Casey Anthony was not parent material. Her parents forced her to have her baby. The harsh reality of raising a child was shocking. Day by day, it became more and more of a challenge . When Caylee was a baby, it was easier because babies sleep a lot. As Cayleee started to walk, then talk, then react, Casey was too immature to handle it. She wasn’t prepared or ready for the task. She didn’t want her mom to feel she was not doing a good job. The sad reality resulted in the death of that sweet little girl.

The media frenzy against Casey was frightening to me. If it was another time, she would have been hung or burned at the stake.Now I fear someone will take justice into their own hands and kill Casey.

People want justice for Caylee. I do too. I beg schools to teach what it really means to have, then raise a child. I beg parents to share the realities with their children about having and raising a child. Then, when they reach the age of puberty, they’ll know the importance of using protection or abstaining from sex!

The best justice for Caylee is preventing another tragedy making sure those who choose to parent are ready, willing and taught what parenting really is. For those who say it’s not for them, respect and acceptance should be the reaction.

 

June 7th, 2011 by Marcia Davis

The Duggers;warm, happy family or pronatal nightmere?

This AM, there they were again. The Duggers sat with their 19 children. Each child sat with smiles plastered across their faces and not even squirming! Jim-Bob, the father of this huge brood, announced his oldest son and daughter in law couldn’t be there because she was due with their second grandchild.

When asked by Matt Lauer if they all wanted large families, it was unanimously “yes” for those who knew what he was asking. The younger children just sat, smiled and never moved.

So, I ask you, is this the portrait of the joys of a huge family, or a pronatalistic nightmere? Of course they have the right to make their own choices about procreation. (Remember, their religious beliefs add to their goals. )However, why does media constantly embrace this family? Why are millions watching their TV series? Is it amazement, jealousy or just skeptical distrust of how they are portrayed?